Implantation and Pregnancy
Session: Poster Session A
jackson sundgren
Graduate Student
University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia, United States
Jackson Kyle Sundgren1,, Taylor Elijah Martin1,2,, Yuehuan Li1 ,, Jonathan Matthew Hancock1,2, , and Xiaoqin Ye1,2
< !1. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
22. Interdisciplinary Toxicology Program, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Abstract Text:
Embryo implantation is an essential and rate-limiting step for mammalian pregnancy. It requires timely mutual communications between a competent embryo and a transiently receptive uterus, which is under the control of ovarian hormones progesterone (P4) and estrogen (E2). The first physical embryo-maternal interaction is established between trophoblasts and uterine luminal epithelial (LE) cells during embryo implantation initiation. How the LE senses the presence of an embryo in preparation for implantation remains largely unknown. Our previous study revealed small GTPase RhoA (Ras homolog family member A) as one of the most highly expressed genes in the day 3.5 post-coitum (D3.5) and D4.5 mouse LE (implantation initiates ~D4.0 in mice). RhoA is a prominent member of the Rho family of GTPases, which can serve as mechano-sensors. It regulates fundamental cellular functions, such as cytoskeletal organization and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interaction. Minimal defined in vivo functions of RhoA in the uterus have been investigated. RhoA is intensely detected in the apical membrane of D3.5 LE, the initial contact of an implanting embryo. Since global deletion of RhoA in mice is embryonic lethal and our attempts to generate uterine epithelial conditional knockout mouse models failed (RhoAf/fWnt7aCre/+ mice died postnatally; and both Ltf and RhoA are in chromosome 9 which prevents the generation of RhoAf/fLtfCre/+ mice), we generated RhoA conditional knockout RhoAf/fPgrCre/+ mice (RhoAd/d), in which RhoA is deleted in progesterone receptor (PR)-expressing cells, the majority of cells in the female reproductive tract. Despite normal ovulation, RhoAd/d mice have P4 deficiency caused by deletion of RhoA in luteal cells. Additionally, these mice are infertile due to failed embryo implantation. To circumvent this confounding factor, we treated preimplantation RhoAd/d mice with P4, which partially rescued embryo implantation. These observations suggest potential local functions of RhoA in the uterus, which are being investigated in ovariectomized RhoAf/fPgr+/+ (control) and RhoAd/d mice treated with vehicle, P4, E2, or E2 + P4 for 24 hours. Pilot PAS staining (detecting mucins, etc.) data show basal staining and responses to these treatments in both control and RhoAd/d uteri. Pilot Masson’s Trichrome staining, which detects collagen (the dominant protein in ECM), etc., reveals comparable staining in vehicle-treated control and RhoAd/d uteri, but upon P4 treatment, there is enhanced staining in the RhoAd/d uteri (largely in intracellular space and extracellular matrices) compared to that in the control uteri. P4 signaling regulates collagen levels. These preliminary data suggest potential functions of uterine RhoA in mediating P4-regulated uterine functions. Since the uterine effects of P4 are mainly mediated via PR, a transcription factor, we are collecting uterine tissues from vehicle, P4, E2, or E2 + P4-treated ovariectomized RhoAf/fPgr+/+ and RhoAd/d mice for mRNA-seq, which will provide a comprehensive picture of RhoA in regulating uterine transcriptome. Selected differentially expressed genes in the RhoAd/d uterus will be further analyzed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of RhoA in regulating uterine functions.